|
derekf
|
Posted 10/07/2010 15:21:29
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 03/05/2011 08:29:33
Posts: 35,
Visits: 173
|
Hi there,
As per the subject, can we get this included (tested on EGJB DCT EGJJ today)
Regards,
Derek...
|
|
derekf
|
Posted 10/07/2010 15:28:00
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 03/05/2011 08:29:33
Posts: 35,
Visits: 173
|
Sorry - should be more specific - Jersey 129.72 is missing whiolst 112.2 is there.
The reason I flag this is that I was in a Cub with no VOR so couldn't listend to 112.2, and also when on the ground at Jersey it's also easier to pickup 129.72.
The ground frequency for Jersey is also missing.
|
|
Tim Dawson
|
Posted 15/07/2010 15:13:02
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 2 days ago @ 16:29:59
Posts: 980,
Visits: 630
|
Interesting. I can see both ATIS frequencies listed in the AIP, but we have presumably just included the first one. We don't want to include both frequencies without somehow qualifying them, but a switch to the other frequency would be possible. Is the ATIS always broadcast on both? I notice the DOC for the latter frequency is only 2nm.
|
|
bsdchapman
|
Posted 15/07/2010 15:56:16
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Active: 27/11/2011 15:15:38
Posts: 19,
Visits: 31
|
The quoted DOC is qualified as 2nm at ground level. This is because the VOR is over the horizon so no good for picking up ATIS on the ground. The VOR however provides a much greater range for broadcast for inbound traffic - but only those so equipped!
|